Which form of construction believes that Congress should not use the Elastic Clause to expand its powers?

The belief that Congress should not use the Elastic Clause to expand its powers aligns with a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Strict construction holds that the federal government is only allowed to exercise the powers specifically listed in the Constitution, and that the Elastic Clause—often seen as a means to expand Congress's authority—should not be used to justify additional powers not explicitly granted. This perspective emphasizes a limited government role, adhering closely to the text as originally written.

In contrast, loose construction supports a more flexible interpretation of the Constitution, allowing for broader powers if the implied actions serve the interests of the nation. Thus, individuals who favor strict construction advocate for a literal and narrow reading of the text to prevent the encroachment of federal authority beyond what is clearly defined. In this way, strict constructionists are cautious about allowing Congress to extend its reach through implied powers, ensuring that the government remains within the confines of its enumerated powers.