What can be inferred about a government's role in relation to constitutional supremacy?

The inference that the constitution acts as a limit to governmental power is grounded in the principle of constitutional supremacy, which asserts that the constitution is the highest law of the land. This principle ensures that all actions taken by the government must comply with the constitution, effectively placing constraints on governmental authority. By serving as a foundation for legal norms and public policy, the constitution protects individual rights and liberties from being infringed upon by the government, thereby establishing a framework where government power is not absolute but rather governed by the rule of law.

In contrast, the notion that government laws could supersede the constitution challenges this foundational principle and would undermine the rule of law. Additionally, the idea that governments can ignore the constitution during emergencies goes against the established norms of constitutional governance and the preservation of individual rights, even in times of crisis. Lastly, the suggestion that constitutional amendments are simple and frequent does not accurately reflect the typically rigorous processes involved in amending a constitution, which are designed to preserve its integrity and stability.